> levels scrolling is 'hacky' on old Pentium. > for slow machines, but is RnD really meant for those? Even in Supaplex > monotone classical Emerald Mines or Boulder Dash. > Snake Bite should be RnD's trademarks, rather than outdated and > that sets such as BD2K3, Walpurgis Flashbacks, Walpurgis Gardens and Maybe we should revise set of levels included in RnD by default? I think You know my candidates, don't hesitate to mention yours. While the latter probably needs some work to be implemented (and therefore belongs to TODO list at least for now), the former can be done any time, it's only a matter of deciding which sets to include (it shouldn't be more than 5-10, otherwise the player can miss them and decide that the game is not worth is, because he had all this 15 years ago on Amiga). Of course the files would then have to be on some central server, but I think it can be arranged somehow. It would also prevent dilemmas like 'where do I put these files anwyay?'. 'Get new levels' and then a list of downloadable sets would be just perfect. There should be a possibility to download levels directly from within the game. They aren't suitable for slow machines, but is RnD really meant for those? Even in Supaplex levels scrolling is 'hacky' on old Pentium.ΔΆ. Maybe we should revise set of levels included in RnD by default? I think that sets such as BD2K3, Walpurgis Flashbacks, Walpurgis Gardens and Snake Bite should be RnD's trademarks, rather than outdated and monotone classical Emerald Mines or Boulder Dash. This impression is obviously wrong and I did my best to change it, but it made me wonder. Recently I heard an opinion that Rocks'n'Diamonds is PC equivalent of Emerald Mines and as such - it sucks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |